Sign in

LKQ CORP (LKQ) Q2 2025 Earnings Summary

Executive Summary

  • Revenue declined 1.9% year over year to $3.642B; GAAP diluted EPS was $0.75 and adjusted diluted EPS was $0.87, reflecting margin pressure from lower volumes and competitive dynamics .
  • Guidance was lowered across organic parts & services revenue (to -3.5% to -1.5%), GAAP EPS ($2.47–$2.77), adjusted EPS ($3.00–$3.30), operating cash flow ($0.875–$1.075B), and free cash flow ($0.60–$0.75B), driven by industry repairable claim weakness in North America, tariff uncertainty, and economic softness in Europe .
  • Management highlighted execution on cost reductions ($125M realized LTM; targeting another $75M in 2025) and portfolio simplification; a UK salvage JV (SYNETIQ) supports European salvage expansion and regulatory readiness .
  • Versus Wall Street consensus, Q2 revenue was modestly above expectations while EPS was below; consensus EPS ~$0.92* vs. adjusted EPS $0.87 and revenue ~$3.62B* vs. $3.642B. Values retrieved from S&P Global.*

What Went Well and What Went Wrong

What Went Well

  • North America outperformed industry repairable claims by ~650 bps, with aftermarket collision parts volume positive despite a 9% industry decline; service levels and fill rates cited as share drivers .
  • Gross margin improved year over year in Europe on procurement and productivity initiatives, even as revenue softened; UK national account renewals largely retained (lost one) .
  • Cost discipline: >$125M removed over the past 12 months; targeting another $75M in 2025, with the majority from Europe, and reduced 2025 capex by ~$50M to mitigate tariff-driven working capital headwinds .
    “We will move faster and harder to simplify our business and reduce costs.” — Justin Jude (CEO)

What Went Wrong

  • Parts & services organic revenue declined 3.4% year over year (2.7% per day basis), pressured by fewer repairable claims in North America and competitive pricing in certain European markets .
  • North America gross margins fell ~100 bps, and segment EBITDA margin declined to 15.8% (from 17.3% a year ago), reflecting competitive dynamics and overhead deleverage from lower revenue .
  • Guidance lowered due to weak June repairable claim trends and persistent macro/geopolitical softness in Europe; management no longer expects a repairable claim rebound in 2025 .

Financial Results

MetricQ4 2024Q1 2025Q2 2025
Revenue ($USD Billions)$3.357 $3.463 $3.642
GAAP Diluted EPS ($)$0.60 $0.65 $0.75
Adjusted Diluted EPS ($)$0.80 $0.79 $0.87
Gross Margin (%)39.5% 39.8% 38.8%
Operating Margin (%)8.1% 8.3% 8.6%
Segment EBITDA Margin (%)12.1% 11.7% 11.8%

Estimates comparison (Q2 2025):

MetricConsensusActual
Primary EPS Consensus Mean ($)0.923*0.87 (Adjusted EPS)
Revenue Consensus Mean ($USD Billions)3.6216*3.642
# of EPS Estimates7*
# of Revenue Estimates7*

Values retrieved from S&P Global.*

Segment revenue and margin (Q2 yoy):

SegmentQ2 2024 Revenue ($MM)Q2 2025 Revenue ($MM)Q2 2024 EBITDA Margin (%)Q2 2025 EBITDA Margin (%)
Wholesale - North America1,474 1,442 17.3% 15.8%
Europe1,639 1,607 10.6% 9.4%
Specialty466 465 8.9% 8.5%
Self Service133 129 9.9% 10.0%
Total3,711 3,642 13.0% 11.8%

Key KPIs:

KPIQ1 2025Q2 2025
Cash from Operations ($MM)-$3 $296
Free Cash Flow ($MM)-$57 $243
Total Debt ($B)$4.4 $4.5
Total Leverage (x EBITDA)2.5x 2.6x
Shares Repurchased (MM)1.0 1.0
Dividends Paid ($MM)$78 $78

Guidance Changes

MetricPeriodPrevious GuidanceCurrent GuidanceChange
Organic revenue growth (parts & services)FY 20250% to 2% (3.5%) to (1.5%) Lowered
Diluted EPS (GAAP)FY 2025$2.91 to $3.21 $2.47 to $2.77 Lowered
Adjusted diluted EPSFY 2025$3.40 to $3.70 $3.00 to $3.30 Lowered
Operating cash flow ($B)FY 2025$1.075 to $1.275 $0.875 to $1.075 Lowered
Free cash flow ($B)FY 2025$0.75 to $0.90 $0.60 to $0.75 Lowered
Capital expenditures ($MM)FY 2025~$50 reduction vs plan Lowered
DividendQ3 2025$0.30 declared (paid Aug 28) Maintained

Earnings Call Themes & Trends

TopicQ4 2024 (Prev-2)Q1 2025 (Prev-1)Q2 2025 (Current)Trend
Tariffs/macroNo new tariffs; Europe EBITDA margin record 10.1% Tariff task force formed; direct imports <10% COGS; indirect ~20% COGS Pricing through tariffs; ~$35M tariff cost in inventory; pass-through intact; working capital headwind Intensifying planning; pass-through maintained
Repairable claimsOngoing softness Expect easing comps; outperformance +570 bps vs claims June worse than expected; no 2025 rebound; NA outperformance ~650 bps Weaker macro; continued share gains
Europe competition/operationsDouble-digit EBITDA in Q4; integration emphasis SKU rationalization >60%; leadership refresh Price concessions in some markets; UK renewals mostly retained; >25% leadership replaced Execution with near-term pressure
Private label & SKUPrivate label +20 bps; target ~30% by 2030 Private label flat seq., +20 bps YTD; SKU reduced by 13k Gradual progress
Salvage & supply chainSustainability focus; salvage advantage, no tariff UK SYNETIQ JV; leverage NA salvage know-how Strategic expansion
Capital allocationBuybacks; dividends Balanced returns; $40M buybacks; $78M dividend $39M buybacks; $78M dividend; maintain IG ratings; extend term loan Consistent
Cost reductionLean initiatives; productivity >$125M removed; target +$75M (mainly Europe) Accelerating

Management Commentary

  • “We will move faster and harder to simplify our business and reduce costs.” — Justin Jude, CEO
  • “We are lowering our full year outlook... persistent economic softness [Europe] and ongoing U.S. trade negotiations are drivers of an uncertain environment.” — Rick Galloway, CFO
  • “Our aftermarket collision parts business witnessed slight growth... we grew market share by ~650 bps better than repairable claim trends.” — Justin Jude
  • “We have extended the maturity date of the $500M U.S. term loan... effective interest rate was 5.2%; ~75% of debt effectively fixed via swaps.” — Rick Galloway

Q&A Highlights

  • Tariffs: ~$35M tariff costs sitting in inventory at Q2 end; pricing pass-through intact; main challenge is trade working capital in 2H; capex reduced by ~$50M to mitigate .
  • North America: Aftermarket volume was positive despite 9% repairable claim decline; APU near 39% as OEM price increases support alternative parts value proposition .
  • Europe: Competitive pricing in UK moderating; retained nearly all renegotiated national accounts (lost one on price) .
  • Salvage JV (UK): No incremental capex required; leverages SYNETIQ infrastructure and LKQ’s distribution .
  • Debt & liquidity: Total debt $4.5B; leverage 2.6x; extended term loan maturity to Q1’27; maintaining IG ratings .

Estimates Context

  • Q2 2025: Primary EPS Consensus Mean ~$0.923 vs. adjusted EPS $0.87; Revenue Consensus Mean ~$$3.6216B vs. $3.642B; 7 estimates for both EPS and revenue.*
    Values retrieved from S&P Global.*

Where estimates may need to adjust:

  • Lowered FY 2025 guidance (organic revenue, EPS, FCF) and commentary indicating no repairable claims rebound in 2025 suggest consensus EPS/FCF will likely move down, with potential offset from cost actions and capex cuts .

Key Takeaways for Investors

  • The quarter showed resilient execution (share gains, service levels) amid weak repairable claims and tariff uncertainty; however, lowered guidance reflects a tougher macro backdrop, especially Europe .
  • North America pricing power and alternative parts mix (APU ~39%) helped offset OEM price increases; aftermarket collision volume was positive despite demand headwinds .
  • Cost program is meaningful (> $125M realized; targeting +$75M in 2025), with European operations the focus; expect benefits to be more visible into 2026 as programs complete .
  • Liquidity and capital structure remain solid (2.6x leverage; swaps fixing ~75% of debt; extended term loan), enabling continued dividends and opportunistic buybacks .
  • Strategic UK salvage JV (SYNETIQ) augments European salvage capability and regulatory readiness, offering potential mix/margin upside over time .
  • For near-term trading: expect sensitivity to repairable claim trends, tariff headlines, and European competitive dynamics; any signs of claim stabilization or successful pass-through of tariffs are potential catalysts .
  • Medium-term thesis: portfolio simplification, lean operations, private label penetration, and salvage expansion underpin margin recovery and ROIC improvement as macro normalizes .
Notes:
* Values retrieved from S&P Global.

Best AI for Equity Research

Performance on expert-authored financial analysis tasks

Fintool-v490%
Claude Sonnet 4.555.3%
o348.3%
GPT 546.9%
Grok 440.3%
Qwen 3 Max32.7%